The Paradise Luxury Homes
Live data
15 insights shared by the community.
What residents appreciate the most
Developments in the Delhi-NCR region, including areas near Gurgaon, benefit from improved infrastructure, better road networks, and multiple access routes. This enhances convenience and connectivity for residents, making commuting and access to key areas more efficient.
Silver County Road is turning out to be a good residential place. Traffic and civic infrastructure problem is everywhere in bangalore.
The project offers three access points, which is a significant advantage.
Dwarka Expressway and UER-II drive housing demand in Delhi-NCR, offering connectivity, growth, and investment opportunities for buyers and...
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
Projects are actively promoted as offering a luxurious and tranquil living experience, often featuring modern designs and comprehensive amenities. The concept of a 'paradise of luxury living' is a key marketing appeal, targeting individuals seeking an elevated and sophisticated lifestyle in Delhi.
Godrej South Estate Prima Delhi – A Spectacular Paradise Of Luxury Living
Dreaming of your own little paradise in the heart of West Delhi? Welcome to DLF Midtown... Where luxury meets tranquility!
Discover your slice of paradise at Deramandi, Delhi — just 10 minutes from Gurgaon Affordable luxury is waiting for you A perfect blend of nature and comfort
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
The luxury housing market in the Delhi-NCR region is experiencing robust growth, characterized by high demand and significant price appreciation for premium properties. This trend indicates a healthy investment environment and a strong consumer preference for high-end residential units in the area.
Rs 6 cr to 45 cr for a flat: NCR's Golf Course Road sees 42% price hike
Risland India expects another 10% Price Rise for its Branded Couture Homes in Chatturpur, New Delhi
Top Indian Cities Post 23% Jump in House Prices, Consultant Says
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
Luxury projects are expected to offer a wide array of amenities and services. These features, while contributing to higher maintenance costs, are considered integral to a premium lifestyle and form a significant part of the project's overall value proposition.
Maintenance is exorbitant. But this is a luxury project and I think maintenance will be according to the services provided.
If you want a premium lifestyle, it comes at a cost.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
Projects by established developers are generally associated with high-quality construction and superior finishes. This commitment to quality aims to provide a premium living experience that is comparable to other top-tier offerings in the luxury real estate market.
At this price point, one is getting a high-quality home comparable to what other Category A builders offer.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
Where residents want improvements
The project levies exceptionally high maintenance fees, reported at around ₹15 per square foot. This cost is considered exorbitant by many and significantly impacts the overall cost of living. While attributed to premium services and low-density design, it raises concerns about long-term affordability.
Unless they pay for my groceries, no amenities will convince me to pay that much.
The maintenance amount is high for the 1st 18 months, ie Rs. 14.35 psqft. on carpet area. The thing to note here is that this also includes the so-called Corpus fund that other builders charge. I had a conversation with them and they confirmed that post the 18 months if the association decides to continue with the builder's maintenance management, it would drop down to approx Rs. 7-10 (rough inflation-adjusted estimate) psqft on carpet, which translates into approx Rs. 5-7 psqft on SBA which is more palatable for me personally.
15rs/sft maintenance? That's like paying 15k a month for a 1000 sft apartment, like rent!!
Maintenance at 15rs/sqft!
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
Portions of the project's land, including designated park areas and spaces for road widening, are slated to be relinquished to local authorities as per development plans. This implies these areas will not be part of the residents' undivided share (UDS) and could lead to future issues or alterations in the community's layout.
Park Area and some project land to be conceded to local authority for road widening as per BDA plan, potentially causing issues in future
Regarding parks and open space it’s to be relinquished in all projects. It will be part of the property anyway. And road widening is barely 10-15 ft so no big deal.
The rera doc - BDA Development plan clearly states “The Parks/ Open Spaces and road widening areas has to be relinquished to the authority”. So these will never be a part of your UDS.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
The project falls under the jurisdiction of a Panchayat rather than a larger municipal corporation. This administrative setup could result in slower future development, increased susceptibility to local issues, and potentially less efficient civic services compared to areas managed by more established urban bodies.
Yes, panchayat is local authority. Residents here may not be dependent on local authority in many ways as the project will be mostly self sufficient. Usually, the development and maintenance of connectivity road is dependent on local authority.
Regarding 7, this is panchayat land, not BBMP or BDA, so future development would be slower plus more prone to issues.
Panchayat as the local authority, BBMP is not the best would certainly better than dealing with panchayat
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
The presence of multiple entry and exit points within the project raises concerns that connecting roads could be claimed by the government as public thoroughfares in the future. This could potentially impact the community's privacy, security, and internal traffic management.
Multiple entry and exit points potentially causing issues in future as govt can claim that road as public road (not likely but possible)
Mutiple entry/exit points can be used as public road - I see this applicable in layouts only. Not sure if this holds true for apartments. May be not.
Regarding 9, if a project has multiple entry exists, the road connecting them can be taken over by the government as it can be considered a public good.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
The project lacks traditional basement parking and instead relies on a multi-level car parking (MLCP) system managed by valet services. This arrangement is perceived as potentially messy and inconvenient, with concerns about the time taken for car retrieval, especially during peak hours or late nights.
MLCP concept in apartments is fairly new and not many have idea how that would turn out. We can just imagine and hope TAT is 5-10 mins. If it doesn't turn out as promised, it's gonna be a problem.
No basement parking and MLCP of 10 floors, this would make parking a mess
Now imagine having to call the valet time and again for getting your car. Also what about mornings and late nights. They will have to be present 24/7. And all that will be billed to us hence the exorbitant Maintainence.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
A high tension wire runs through the project, with a pylon located inside the society boundary. While there is a proposal to make the wire underground by the time of possession, there is no firm guarantee, leading to concerns about safety and the aesthetic impact on the development.
There is a proposal to make the wire underground and probably feasibility check is being done... However, there is no guarantee that it will be completed by hand over time. If they are saying by possession time, it will no longer exist, ask them in writing.
As per my communication with them, the wire will be made underground and work is already started on that. At possession, it will no longer be above our heads.
High Tension Wire going through he project with a pylon inside the society boundary
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
Some units exhibit design shortcomings, such as the absence of windows in the study and kitchen areas. While a utility room might have a window, the lack of direct natural light in these key spaces is considered a poor design choice by some prospective buyers.
I was surprised too with no window in study room. This is definitely a bad design. Kitchens are generally attached to Utility Room. so in my view, no window in kitchen is not a big concern.
No windows in study and kitchen (utility has a windo though)
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
Units within the project feature significant shared walls, particularly noted in areas like guest bedrooms. This design choice, while becoming more common with certain construction methods, is considered unacceptable by some buyers at this price point, potentially impacting privacy and noise insulation.
Yes, Guest bedroom wall is shared. I think shared walls is becoming common feature with Mivan constructions. I see this with other A category builders too in their recent launches.
There's 1 shared wall in the guest bedroom. I'm not sure if that counts as significant. Maybe my standards might be lower then :p
Shared Walls, significant shared walls at this price point are not acceptable
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
Despite being positioned as a luxury project, the towers do not feature a double-height lobby. This architectural element is often expected in high-end developments to create a grand and spacious entrance, and its omission is noted as a missed opportunity given the project's premium pricing.
That's true. Although not many builders are offering that in Bangalore right now, but they should've done that at this price.
No Double Height Tower Lobby
Each time of my visit, I was told that there would be double height lobby of atleast 15 ft. Don't know where the discrepancy is.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
The developer imposes a restriction on the resale of units until possession is granted. This policy is considered restrictive compared to other major builders who typically allow resale within two years, potentially limiting investment flexibility for buyers.
That is true. Resale is allowed only at the possession time. But this is an individual choice of buyer and in no way this makes project less attractive.
No Resale Till Possession permitted by the builder, all major CatA builders let you do so within 2 years
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.