HomebangaloreDS Max Sky Shlokam

DS Max Sky Shlokam

Live data
DS-MAX Properties Private Limited Navarathna Agrahara, bangalore
DS Max Sky Shlokam
Price Range
62.56 L - 1.21 Cr
Price / Sqft
₹6.2 K/sq.ft
Possession
Mar, 2031
Configurations
2, 3 BHK Apartments
Total Units
—
Locality
Navarathna Agrahara
Resident sentiment
Project issues pulse

6 insights shared by the community.

1 positives5 negativesAdd your perspective to help others decide.
Sort by:
Positives

What residents appreciate the most

1 entry
Positive issue
2 comments
Affordable for Renters

While the project's prices are noted as attractive compared to competitors, this affordability primarily translates into a budget-friendly option for tenants. For those seeking rental accommodation, the cost-to-benefit ratio, despite average facilities and maintenance, is considered acceptable.

Community pulse
2 upvotes0 downvotes
Resident feedback
PR
Payal R.

The prices are quite appealing, making it a viable option if you're looking to rent.

DR
Devendra R.

As a tenant, I find the rent reasonable, even if the facilities are just average.

Add your comment

Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.

Negatives

Where residents want improvements

5 entries
Negative issue
3 comments
Substandard Maintenance and Facilities Management

The maintenance services provided by the builder are consistently described as poor and below average. Issues range from inadequate upkeep of common areas to specific problems like unmanaged parking, where residents frequently find their designated spots occupied. Even when maintenance fees are paid as part of the purchase agreement, the service remains unsatisfactory.

Community pulse
5 upvotes0 downvotes
Resident feedback
SK
Suman K.

Maintenance is a constant struggle; the builder's service is simply not up to par.

LS
Lavanya S.

We've had to deal with below-average facilities and poor upkeep, despite paying for maintenance.

SP
Sanjay P.

Parking is a nightmare; there's no proper management, and people park wherever they want.

Add your comment

Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.

Negative issue
3 comments
Not Recommended for Purchase or Investment

Despite attractive initial pricing, the project is widely considered not worth purchasing, especially for investment purposes. The builder is often seen as lacking a strong reputation, and potential buyers are strongly advised to avoid their projects entirely due to the multitude of issues and poor post-sales support. The builder is perceived to target budget-conscious buyers who may have less influence.

Community pulse
5 upvotes0 downvotes
Resident feedback
HK
Hemant K.

This builder is not reputable; you're better off looking at other options.

NM
Naveen M.

My cousin decided to avoid this builder entirely after hearing about the problems.

BR
Balaji R.

I would strongly advise against buying a flat from this builder; it's not a good investment.

Add your comment

Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.

Negative issue
3 comments
Rude and Unresponsive Customer Service

Interactions with the builder's staff, particularly the CRM team, are frequently characterized by rudeness and a complete lack of responsiveness. Attempts to address issues are met with dismissive attitudes and unhelpful answers. There is a perception that the builder is indifferent to their brand image and unwilling to rectify errors, especially when dealing with buyers perceived as less influential.

Community pulse
5 upvotes0 downvotes
Resident feedback
SK
Suresh K.

The customer service is appalling; employees are rude and dismissive when you try to get answers.

SN
Sameer N.

You're left with no choice but to tolerate the poor service and attitudes.

LS
Lavanya S.

It feels like the builder doesn't care about resolving issues or maintaining their reputation.

Add your comment

Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.

Negative issue
4 comments
Severe Construction Quality and Design Flaws

Residents have reported significant structural and design issues, including major flaws in sewage outflow planning leading to backflow and basement flooding. There are also complaints of massive seepage spots in rooms during the rainy season. These problems are attributed to extensive cost-cutting measures and a tendency to skirt building codes, resulting in a complex array of underlying issues.

Community pulse
5 upvotes0 downvotes
Resident feedback
KN
Kiran N.

We've experienced severe sewage backflow and flooding in the basement due to poor design.

AV
Amit V.

The overall quality of the apartments is quite low, almost like a cheap imitation.

TP
Tanvi P.

The quality of construction is poor; there are noticeable seepage issues in multiple rooms during monsoon.

LP
Lata P.

It seems like corners were cut everywhere, leading to a tangled mess of problems that are hard to resolve.

Add your comment

Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.

Negative issue
3 comments
Systemic Issues and Ongoing Litigation

The builder appears to have a history of systemic problems across multiple projects, leading to ongoing legal disputes. There are reports of numerous issues in various developments, and the builder is often perceived as only taking action to rectify problems when faced with external threats or official complaints.

Community pulse
4 upvotes0 downvotes
Resident feedback
GM
Gaurav M.

They only fixed the sewage problem after we threatened to report them to the authorities.

AK
Anjali K.

There are multiple legal cases against the builder for similar issues.

RN
Rahul N.

It seems like every project has a host of problems; it's a recurring pattern.

Add your comment

Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.

MyHousingWiki

The G2 for India's apartment projects. Crowdsourced truth, verified by AI, and builder-transparent.

TwitterLinkedInGitHub

Explore

  • Bangalore Projects
  • Hyderabad Projects
  • Pune Projects
  • Latest Discussions

Platform

  • How it Works
  • Data Verification
  • Builder Dashboard
  • Guidelines

Support

  • Help Center
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2026 MyHousingWiki. All rights reserved.

Builder's Perspective

Response to hard water issues:

"We have initiated the setup of a centralized soft-water plant which is expected to be operational by Q2 2026. This will significantly reduce TDS levels across all towers."

Verified Response • Jan 5, 2026
M
MyHousingWiki
LoginSign Up