Air Force And Naval Officers Enclave
Live data
6 insights shared by the community.
What residents appreciate the most
A new directive from the aviation authority mandates the closing of window shades during takeoff and landing at defense airports. This measure is intended to bolster national security by concealing the locations of air defense systems and preventing unauthorized photography or video recording of military bases. It addresses previous issues of public non-compliance with photography restrictions, thereby enhancing the operational security of military installations.
Photography has been prohibited on military airports for a long time. But due to lack of public compliance, they've changed it to keeping window shades closed.
Many people record from windows and upload on social media, which can turn problematic as these are defense airports. It's crucial to prevent day-to-day bird's eye views of defense facilities from being openly available on the internet.
New policy by the aviation authority directed airlines to keep all windows except those on emergency exits closed when operating from defense airports with civil enclaves until the aircraft has reached an altitude of 10,000 ft. They also instructed airlines to remind the passengers that photography of military bases are prohibited.
This policy is implemented to conceal locations of air defense systems.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
Plans are in motion for the construction of new civilian airports in certain locations, which will allow existing airports to be exclusively dedicated to defense purposes. This future separation is expected to resolve the current conflicts between civilian passenger safety protocols and military security requirements, leading to more streamlined and secure operations for both sectors.
A new airport is being built, and the current airport will be solely a defense airport.
A city is getting a new airport next year.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
Where residents want improvements
The new policy requiring closed window shades at defense airports is widely seen as ineffective 'security theatre.' Critics argue that military installations are already visible via satellite imagery, high-rise buildings, and advanced drones. Furthermore, the policy relies heavily on passenger compliance, which is often lacking, leading to continued photography and potential security breaches. This measure also detracts from the passenger experience by obscuring scenic views and is perceived as a poorly thought-out, knee-jerk reaction.
It's sad. The aerial view of the city is to die for, especially during sunrise/sunset flights. People won't get to see this beauty anymore.
There are dozens of high-rises right next to the airport. It's just all stupid. The milk has spilled and now they are looking at the pan.
If a spy really wanted to look outside, wouldn't they just open the window and see? Spies are not afraid of most things, least of which will be the staff in the airplane.
It's pretty much just security theater; if someone wanted to do harm, satellite imagery, drone footage, and standing by a fence can accomplish a lot.
Passengers are always reminded not to click photos in defense airports, and funnily enough, none of them ever listen. People just board off and start taking selfies with the plane.
This rule just seems too knee-jerk to me. It's easier to have hangar doors than this, and this measure also relies on compliance by the general public.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
A new directive from the aviation authority mandates closing window shades during takeoff and landing at defense airports, including those used by residents of the enclave. This policy is widely criticized for compromising passenger safety, as open windows are crucial for emergency preparedness, situational awareness, and efficient evacuation. Many perceive this as prioritizing military security over human safety, a departure from standard international aviation practices.
Main reasons for keeping window blinds open include emergency preparedness, situational awareness for cabin crew, and evacuation efficiency. This new policy seems to contradict these safety measures.
This caused tension during a flight with heavy turbulence. People were shaking and shouting, and on top of that, the crew asked us to close the windows, making many anxious about a potential crash.
This is a really dumb procedure in the event of an incident or evacuation.
This is a breach of passenger safety. Most airlines force you to open windows for takeoff and landing for a reason.
The aviation authority is willing to compromise on passenger safety with this new rule.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
A significant safety concern for residents was highlighted by the murder and robbery of a retired Air Force Wing Commander's wife within the Dwarka Sector-7 enclave. The perpetrator, a realtor, had befriended the victim and was a repeat offender, having been recently released from jail. This incident raises questions about the overall security and vetting processes for individuals interacting with residents in such a community.
The 56-year-old man, arrested for allegedly killing the wife of a retired Indian Air Force Wing Commander in Dwarka, was released from jail last year.
The deceased was identified as 52-year-old, a resident of Air Force Naval Officers' Enclave in Dwarka Sector-7.
A 52-year-old woman, the wife of a retired Indian Air Force Wing Commander, was found dead at her residence in Dwarka Sector 7.
The victim was found dead at her house at the Air Force Naval Officers Enclave in Dwarka Sector 7. Her jewellery and some cash were stolen.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
Serving and retired armed forces personnel have faced prolonged issues regarding their housing, leading to legal battles against the Air Force Naval Housing Board (AFNHB) in national and state consumer courts. This indicates potential dissatisfaction with housing allocation, maintenance, or administrative processes within the community.
A group of serving and retired armed forces personnel have moved the national and State consumer courts against the Air Force Naval Housing Board (AFNHB) due to a long battle for houses.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.