DSR Evoq
Live data
16 insights shared by the community.
What residents appreciate the most
The project is situated in a highly desirable location in Whitefield, offering excellent proximity to Hopefarm junction, the metro station, and other major hubs, ensuring good connectivity. The area has a pleasant residential ambiance with convenient access to local shops and markets. Its closeness to Alembic City, where a Google office is expected, is seen as a significant advantage, potentially boosting rental yields and resale demand.
The area benefits from strong IT hub connectivity, contributing to its overall popularity and investment potential.
The location is very near to Alembic city, which could significantly increase rental yield and resale demand due to the upcoming Google office.
The project's location and its proximity to Hopefarm junction are highly appealing, providing a residential feel with easy access to local amenities.
It offers good connectivity to the metro and the wider Whitefield area, making it a well-connected choice.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
The project's pricing, estimated around 12,000 all-inclusive per square foot, is generally considered reasonable and competitive for its prime location in Whitefield. This attractive pricing strategy has successfully drawn a considerable number of prospective buyers.
The attractive price point is a key draw, especially considering its excellent location near the metro and major hubs.
The pricing is good for the location, which is why it's attracting a good number of interested parties.
The overall pricing, around 12k all-inclusive per sqft, seems decent for the area.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
The project offers units with south-facing balconies, a highly sought-after orientation in Bangalore. This design choice is beneficial for maximizing natural sunlight and ensuring good ventilation within the homes, which is particularly valued given the city's climate.
Sunlight is often scarce in Bangalore, making units with good sun orientation very appealing.
The availability of south-facing balconies is a positive aspect, as this direction is preferred for sunlight.
South or southwest-facing balconies are generally desired in Bangalore for optimal sun exposure.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
DSR Evoq is a large-scale development spanning 7.8 acres, designed with an impressive 85% open spaces. It features high-rise towers of 29 and 30 storeys, offering a wide selection of 2, 3, and 4 BHK luxury flats. Residents can enjoy a substantial 30,000 sqft clubhouse and a comprehensive array of over 35 amenities, promising a premium living experience.
The project boasts 7.8 acres of land with 85% open spaces, featuring impressive 29 and 30-storey towers offering various BHK configurations.
It includes 724 luxury flats, a large 30,000 sqft clubhouse, and more than 35 amenities, indicating a comprehensive lifestyle offering.
The land parcel appears to be well-planned and substantial.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
A notable advantage is that the project's land parcel is surrounded by existing villas and individual houses. This ensures that there will be no future high-rise constructions in the immediate vicinity, preserving views and maintaining a less congested environment.
The surrounding area is covered by villas and individual houses, meaning no high-rise buildings are expected nearby.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
According to the sales team, the project is being constructed using Mivan technology. This modern construction method is known for its speed, efficiency, and superior finish, suggesting a commitment to contemporary building practices.
The sales team has confirmed that this project utilizes Mivan technology.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
Where residents want improvements
The builder, DSR, has a consistently negative reputation, frequently described as notorious, unreliable, and even using aggressive tactics. There are numerous complaints about their rude and uncooperative customer relationship management (CRM) team, subpar quality in past projects, and a general lack of concern for residents after sales. This significantly impacts trust and satisfaction.
Previous experiences with the builder's CRM team have been very poor, characterized by rudeness and uncooperativeness.
The builder has a history of cutting corners and possesses a lower brand value compared to more reputable developers.
The builder is widely regarded as a notorious and unreliable entity, with strong negative sentiments.
The quality of the builder's projects is generally considered average and not justifying the premium pricing.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
The builder has a documented history of project delays and significant challenges in obtaining Occupancy Certificates (OC) for its completed developments, often attributed to deviations from approved plans. The project itself has a lengthy RERA-mandated waiting period of four years, raising concerns about potential further delays and the builder's financial capacity to complete the project on time.
There are indications that construction might be stalled due to slow sales and financial constraints, which could lead to inevitable project delays.
Recent properties by the builder have not secured OC due to unapproved deviations in construction.
The builder is known for being unreliable with handovers, and past projects have faced substantial delays in receiving Occupancy Certificates.
A long RERA waiting period of four years for this project suggests a high likelihood of extended delays.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
The project operates under a Joint Venture model, which is identified as a significant risk factor. This arrangement often leads to potential complications with legal documentation, unclear land titles, and increased susceptibility to delays arising from disputes or disagreements between the builder and the landowner. The lack of clarity regarding the A Khata or B Khata status further exacerbates these concerns.
JV projects frequently experience delays due to complex terms and potential disagreements between the builder and the landowner.
Concerns were raised about the project's A Khata or B Khata status, which the builder did not adequately address.
The Joint Venture model is a big risk, often leading to issues with legal papers and unclear titles.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
A significant environmental concern is the presence of a primary nala (Rajakaluve) and storm water drainage system located directly in front of the project's main entrance. While the sales team asserts that the nala will be covered or is already dried, this claim is met with skepticism and remains a potential source of hygiene and aesthetic issues.
Marketing personnel claim the rajakaluve is dried and poses no issue, but this statement is viewed with doubt.
A primary nala runs right in front of the project, which is a considerable concern, despite sales assurances that it will be covered.
The presence of a storm water drainage system at the main entrance is identified as a major drawback.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
Residents in other projects by the same builder have reported severe issues with electricity connections. Instead of standard BESCOM connections, High Tension (HT) connections with private meters were installed, leading to inflated electricity bills (often double the normal rates) and frequent power cuts. This setup also prevents residents from benefiting from government electricity schemes.
The HT connection with private meters prevents residents from utilizing government electricity schemes.
Other projects by the builder have issues with HT connections and private meters, leading to unreliable power supply.
Residents in similar setups have reported paying extremely high electricity charges, sometimes double the normal rates.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
There is a noticeable inconsistency between the advertised per-square-foot price and the actual all-inclusive price quoted by the sales team. The builder is perceived to deliberately keep pre-launch prices low to attract initial interest, only to increase them later. Many potential buyers feel that the all-inclusive price, such as 12,000 per square foot, is excessively high given the builder's average quality and reputation.
The builder seems to intentionally keep prices low during pre-launch to attract Expressions of Interest, with final prices expected to be higher.
The advertised price of 10.2K/sqft differs significantly from the actual quoted price, which is closer to 12K/sqft.
The pre-launch pricing is not seen as sufficiently low given the various risks and caveats associated with the project.
The all-inclusive rate of 12k per sqft is considered too steep for the builder's perceived quality and reputation.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
Many units, particularly 2BHKs and 4BHKs, are criticized for their design, featuring north-facing balconies and inward-facing master bedroom windows. This orientation severely limits natural sunlight, resulting in 'dark units' and poorly lit rooms. The overall unit planning is deemed disastrous, with windows facing each other and creating blockages, further reducing light and privacy.
Many units, especially 4BHKs, have north-facing balconies, which significantly impacts natural sunlight.
North-facing balconies are generally considered undesirable in Bangalore due to the lack of direct sunlight.
The unit planning is considered disastrous, with windows facing each other and creating blockages, resulting in 'dark units'.
The 2BHKs have only north balconies and inward-facing master bedroom windows, leading to rooms with no sunlight.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
There are indications of the builder's financial instability, evidenced by reports of significant price drops in other DSR projects. This suggests potential difficulties in selling units and a possible lack of sufficient funds to maintain consistent construction progress, which could lead to further project delays and impact investor confidence.
Reports indicate significant price drops in other projects by the same builder, such as DSR The Address and DSR Elixir.
This suggests potential financial issues and difficulties in selling units, which could lead to construction delays.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
The immediate vicinity of the project faces challenges such as narrow roads (40 feet) and the presence of a cowshed on the land parcel, which can impact the living environment. Furthermore, the broader Whitefield area is criticized by some as needing significant infrastructural revamp, with parts of it being described as a 'slum area'.
The area around the project has narrow roads (40 feet) and a cowshed on the land parcel, which is a concern.
The Whitefield location is described as needing a major revamp, with some referring to it as a 'slum area'.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.
Beyond general quality concerns, specific issues reported in other projects include subpar construction, leading to plumbing problems and seepage in parking areas and flats within the first year of occupancy. There are also observations about the use of outdated construction methods, such as RCC instead of modern Mivan technology. Essential safety features like CCTV in basement parking are often missing, contributing to security incidents and thefts, and the maintenance staff is described as incompetent.
The construction quality is described as subpar, with reports of plumbing issues and seepage in parking and flats.
There are concerns about the builder still using the older RCC method instead of modern Mivan technology.
Essential safety features like CCTV in basement parking are often absent, leading to security concerns and thefts.
Keep it clear, factual, and helpful for other residents.